International Atomic Energy Agency Admission
Vic Bishop, Staff
Waking Times Media
The Fukushima nuclear meltdown has had exponential repercussions on the world. When the disaster happened, the media was all over it. People were concerned and wanted action. But very quickly, the media’s eye turned to another matter, then another, then another. Now, very few people likely think about the Fukushima disaster and what mark it made on the world.
Regardless of the lack of mainstream media attention, the Fukushima nuclear disaster is still affecting the world today. Over nearly six years now the leak from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant caused by the tsunami and preceding Tōhoku earthquake on 11 March 2011.
Officials State The Entire Pacific Ocean is in Danger
In response to the disaster, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an organization that seeks to promote the peaceful use of Nuclear Power, established a joint IAEA Technical Cooperation (TC) project in cooperation with the Regional Cooperative Agreement (RCA) Member States. Energy News reports:
At the IAEA Board of Governors Meeting in 2015, Ambassador Glyn Davies, Permanent U.S. Representative to the IAEA, 2011: Today the Secretariat has presented to us a new Technical Cooperation project entitled “Marine benchmark study on the possible impact of the Fukushima radioactive releases in the Asia-Pacific Region.”
… Member States in the region are understandably concerned for the safety of their marine environments. The IAEA has unique expertise to offer in helping them to assess how recent events in Japan may affect their food and water resources…
The United States fully supports this project… While the Secretariat has demonstrated admirable flexibility and agility in assembling this project quickly to meet an urgent need, we recognize… extra-budgetary resources are required… My delegation is pleased to announce that the United States will immediately make available $400,000 for this new regional, Fukushima-related project… We hope this contribution will allow the project to move forward without delay…
The Marine benchmark study on the possible impact of the Fukushima radioactive releases in the Asia-Pacific Region can be viewed here. It states:
“…there have been releases of radioactively contaminated water into the marine environment neighbouring the north east coast of the island of Honshu. It is assumed that this radioactive contamination could be transported and circulated through the Pacific Ocean. Consequently, RCA Member States have expressed concern about the possible impact of these releases on their coastal zones.
“An urgent and harmonised regional approach is essential to optimise and coordinate the application of the available skills and resources in the region in order to benchmark the possible impact of this release of radioactivity…
“The area potentially affected may encompass much of the Pacific Ocean, which covers one third of the area of the globe.”
The Extent of the Fukushima Radiation Contamination
More than 80% of the radioactive material from the damaged reactors has leaked into the Pacific Ocean over the last six years. This makes the Fukushima disaster far worse than Chernobyl or Three Mile Island.
The Kuroshio Current, a Western Pacific version of the Gulf Stream, has carried much of the radioactive material out into the Pacific Ocean. Now, materials such as radioactive isotopes of cesium have started appearing on the West Coast of North America. For example, in 2015, trace amounts of cesium-134 and cesium-137 turned up in samples collected near Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada.
In December 2016, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), a crowd-funded team of scientists, announced that they had detected seaborne cesium 134 in seawater on the shores of Tillamook Bay in Oregon. According to Ken Buesseler, a marine chemist at WHOI, the problem with nuclear energy and fallout is that radioactive materials can travel great distances with the help of the wind and the sea. The scientist believes that we could have avoided this major human disaster if IAEA had been monitoring the oceans more diligently.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Vic Bishop is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and OffgridOutpost.com Survival Tips blog. He is an observer of people, animals, nature, and he loves to ponder the connection and relationship between them all. He is a believer in always striving to becoming self-sufficient and free from the matrix.
This article (Officials State 1/3 of the World’s Oceans May Be Contaminated with Fukushima Radiation) was originally created and published by Waking Times Media and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Vic Bishop and WakingTimesMedia.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
SOURCE with thanks http://www.earth-heal.com/news/news/43-fukushima/3124-fukushima-1-3-world-s-oceans-contaminated.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+EarthHeal-NewsForAnEarthInTransition+%28Earth+Heal+-+News+for+an+Earth+in+Transition%29
Ask yourself …
Is human and environmental contamination from Fukushima the ‘gross pollution’ mentioned in The Report From Iron Mountain?
More Hegelian Dialectic? Planetary rulers create the problem to increase fear, decrease resistance to their solution, which empowers them and dis-empowers the people, who consent because they are ill informed?
The Iron Mountain Report – Summary
Iron Mountain is a report on how to circumvent the Constitution. It is a document of treason couched in innocuous titles and words.
It is a report on the handling of men, women, children and babies on the basis of “herd or animal management” without regard to morality.
The Constitution has been effectively canceled by Iron Mountain.
The heart of the Iron Mountain report is that war is absolutely necessary and economically a necessary waste. It creates artificial demand.
The organization of a society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer.
The basic authority of the modern state over its people resides in its war powers.
War is the glue that holds the nation together and rallies the people to make such sacrifices so they can build up a huge war machine.
Therefore, a substitute for the war system must be found in order to control the people and provide stability and legitimacy of government if we go into an era of peace.
As they phase war out they have to phase whatever they put in its place to control the people.
New political machinery would be needed at once.
Until a substitute for war is developed then war must continue in order to remain in control. Keep war until all substitutes are in place so we don’t lose our rulership and to remain in power.
The substitute for war must be a universal threat of equal magnitude as that of world war. The immediate loss of lifestyles . . . .
It must be credible. It must be accepted by the vast majority of the population of the whole world.
Credibility, in fact, lies at heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war.
A nation would self-destruct without an external threat of some type.
It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be INVENTED, rather than developed from some unknown conditions.
It may be, for instance, that GROSS POLLUTION of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass extinction by nuclear weapons as the principle threat to the survival of the species.
In other words, they are going to bring the environment up to the point as the principal threat to the survival of the species by poisoning the water, the food and the air. Environmental disasters constitute a threat that can only be dealt with through a social system on a global scale to offer a solution.
Doreen Ann Agostino
all rights reserved